Facts Win… Or Do They?
20 November 2021
An article published (PDF) on the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health website on the 14th September 2021 titled “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?” should be the final nail in the coffin of the COVID/vaccine narrative being pushed the world over by globalists, Governments and billionaires.
I say “should be”, because if there’s one thing many people seem immune to these days is facts and evidence. But all we can do is tell the truth, explain, show evidence and hope that people begin to see what this is all really about. Here we are going to briefly look at the article cited above and show how these “vaccines” are not just ineffective, but even in the short term it is evident that they are actually harmful, and for those that believe COVID-19 is real, as opposed to the likelihood it is a reclassification of existing respiratory ailments, you’re better off taking your chances with the COVIDS than having this injection.
This article is focused on (as it explains in the abstract) “issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children”. It says:
The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437699/
A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
Let’s read that again. The “cost-benefit analysis showed” that there are “FIVE TIMES THE NUMBER OF DEATHS ATTRIBUTABLE TO EACH INOCULATION VS THOSE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COVID-19 IN THE MOST VULNERABLE 65+ DEMOGRAPHIC”.
And… if that wasn’t bad enough, as the risks from COVID-19 decrease drastically as age decreases, the risk-benefit ratio increases, and with the unknown long-term effects obviously still unknown, that risk could be substantial.
This is not anti-vaxxer medical misinformation. This is peer-reviewed, published, data-backed research on the U.S. Government National Institute for Health website. It doesn’t argue anything about the existence of SARS-CoV-2, the existence of a pandemic or otherwise. It takes the standard reported figures from all the mainstream accepted sources including various Government figures, looks at the so-called “clinical trials” and demonstrates the evidence that they are not valid, identifies many of the issues around the RT-PCR “testing”, the changes in cycle thresholds to manage the “breakthrough” cases after people were being injected en masse, figures on VAERS, the definition of the word “vaccine” and how it is not applicable to these so-called treatments.
It is well worth the read, as it establishes without any room for doubt many of the things that are wrong with how this has all been managed, but most of all, how this should not be given to children. As an adult if you want to go and get yourself injected, that’s on you. Children is a different matter and this must stop now. The evidence is clear.