We live in a corrupted system. The way to tackle corruption is to first acknowledge it exists. Only then is it possible to come up with ways of dealing with it, but don't make the mistake of believing the system can or will uncorrupt itself.

Conspiracy Theory = Early Access News

9 January 2022

On the 3rd January 2022 the Express published an article (image) titled “Covid microchip developer says there’s no stopping roll-out: ‘Whether we like it or not!'”.

Let’s set aside for a moment that so-called Conspiracy Theorists have been saying this is where things are headed, not just because they have a sixth-sense, or can see in to the future, but because despite desperate attempts to “fact-check” and “debunk” these “claims”, various scientific, investment and tech outlets have reported on progress being made for this exact thing.

For example, in December 2019 this study published on the Science Translational Medicine website titled “Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination” was an early indicator of where “vaccine” technology was headed. Notwithstanding the convenient timing of this, at the same time the “novel coronavirus” was escaping from a Wuhan lab or maybe a Wuhan wet market or something, definitely China or maybe not, the initial public forays into some kind of implanted vaccination record was happening. Within what seemed like minutes Bill Gates was omni-present on TV telling everyone that “life only goes back to normal” after they’ve “vaccinated” the entire world.

One of the big organisations pushing for a global digital ID system is the ID2020 alliance, started in 2016 and founded by the following:

• Microsoft, an obvious Bill Gates/World Economic Forum connection.

• GAVI which is The Vaccine Alliance mostly founded by Gates Foundation money and has partnered with UNICEF, the World Health Organisation, the World Bank, vaccine manufacturers and “research agencies” with a business model aimed to “influence the markets for vaccines and other products”.

• The Rockefeller Foundation who at this point should need no introduction, but for reference see the Gates/Rockefeller connection, not to mention the general history of the family.

• IDEO.ORG who’s partners include the Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Bezos Family Foundation and the UK Department for International Development.

• Accenture, a tech and consulting company that has multi-billion dollar Government contracts, pays only 2.3% tax in Ireland compared to the average corporation rate of 24%, manages US health records, is partnered with Apple and also provides “content moderation” for Facebook, all according to Wikipedia. They are also partnered with the World Economic Forum for their “Known Traveller” digital ID and security idea as you can see from this video…

So it’s hardly a stretch for anyone paying attention to see that Bill Gates, the world’s largest individual vaccine salesman and profiteer is also close to the epicentre of all these digital ID “ecosystems” and their developments.

Obviously the first issue regarding the idea of an all-encompassing ID system is that of privacy, be that data privacy or personal privacy. This should not require the analysis of “security experts” to understand what is at stake, and the potential catastrophes that could occur. I use the words “potential” and “could” simply because no-one can state with 100% certainty anything about the future in these contexts, but history has shown us repeatedly what happens when a “papers please” society is implemented. Just because these digital IDs and passes are not literally made of paper does not mean they are any less dangerous. More so in fact as the facility to connect your digital pass to every aspect of your life including your unique biology, not to mention the complete centralisation of it means that this is such an enormous threat to humanity it is impossible to overstate it.

Of course, these systems and plans are dressed up in the usual garb of “The Greater Good”… things like the need to be able to digitally identify yourself is a human right, or access to the global digital financial system is a human right, or some other pseudo-noble equality-based notion. Indeed the video above makes the assertion that their digital ID traveller pass system is needed because of a baseless claim that international travel will grow to a point that the existing “infrastructure” can’t cope. They don’t demonstrate any evidence of that, and the solution proposed is clearly something they just want to do, so they just use these “we’re just trying to help” based on a fake problem to sell their plans to an unwitting and politically disenfranchised public.

This is indicated by the headline in the article quoted right at the start that contains the line “Whether we like it or not!'”. Dated the 24th August 2021 on the World Economic Forum website there is an article titled “Is data privacy a thing of the past in a digital world?” which of course is not really a question but a way of telling you this is the case, “whether we like it or not”. This WEF article is authored by Arathi Sethumadhavan who is:

…the Head of User Research on the Ethics & Society team within Microsoft’s Cloud & AI business and a Fellow at the World Economic Forum. Prior to joining Microsoft, she worked on creating human-machine systems that enabled individuals to be effective in complex environments in aviation and healthcare. Arathi has a PhD in Human Factors Psychology and an undergraduate degree in Computer Science.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/dr-arathi-sethumadhavan

The perfect mix, Microsoft, WEF, AI, healthcare and a PhD in Human Factors Psychology.

It is abundantly and demonstrably clear that the idea of digital IDs and connecting that to health/vaccine records has been on the cards for some time, and is the plan of those who have pushed all the most media hyped aspects of the fake pandemic, be that the so-called vaccines, the resetting of the economy off the back of the “pandemic”, and the push for vaccine passports. The idea that it would eventually migrate to implanted microchips or bio-digital tech is also an obvious destination based on things already in development before and during the COVID Show.

As we see various Governments around the world jackboot-march their way down the path of totalitarianism, each at different stages of implementing their “vaccine passes” to exclude the “unvaccinated” from a varying spectrum of daily life, many people are seemingly oblivious to what is happening around them. Some are actively supporting this segregation which is indefensible, but others are just unaware. Doing as they are told, taking their “boosters” each time a politician or State-funded “expert” tells them to with no idea of where things are headed. This is not some ethereal crystal-ball gazing prediction about dystopian futures. This is happening right now. People who dare to object to this inhuman idea of medical segregation and the attempted stripping of inalienable rights are being violently attacked by Government thugs in the streets…

While the direction of travel regarding “vaccine passports”, digital IDs and various microchip/biotech implementations are all being worked on, implemented and so on, and people who protest against all this are routinely beaten in the streets, including in the UK, the article mentioned at the start cited Hannes Sjoblad, managing director of DSruptive Subdermals who said:

If you understand how these implants work, they don’t have a battery. They cannot transmit a signal by themselves. So they are basically passive. They sit there asleep. They can never tell your location, they’re only activated when you touch them with your smartphone, so this means they cannot be used for tracking anyone’s location.

Hannes Sjoblad director of DSruptive Subdermals – https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1542866/covid-microchip-developer-rollout-vaccine-passport

and “assured that the implants are not tracking devices, and are only in use when they are scanned”.

Apparently Hannes Sjoblad doesn’t understand how this kind of technology works either, as less than a week after this article was published, the Express published an article (image) on the 9th January 2022 titled “Covid microchip: UK startup says technology WILL be able to track your every move”.

Again, this should be obvious to anyone with an inkling of how this stuff works, and Sjoblad was simply either lying or has literally no idea how his company’s main tech functions. Paul McClure, the founder of a scannable medical card called MedTag is quoted in this new article explaining how people can be tracked with it. He says:

Basically, the technology works on Near Field Communication (NFC). The chip is inert and is activated when an NFC reader is passed over it. Most smartphones are now NFC readers and can read the chip. So while the chip in itself does not allow you to be tracked, in reality, any venue which scans it can then use geolocation to record where you have been scanned/checked in.

When the developer said that this cannot be used to track your location- yes it absolutely can, but not on its own. With the right technology scanning it, it can 100 percent track your location at that point in time. But in an environment where you actually have to mandatorily show a covid pass in order to get inside a venue, at that point in time it absolutely can tell where you are.

Paul McClure founder of MedTag – https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1545978/covid-microchip-uk-tracking-location-nfc-dsruptive-subdermals

Of course you can be tracked with an implant that responds to external signals, and yes smartphones do exactly the same thing but of course you can leave your phone at home, or get rid of it. You can’t do that with an implant.

Within a week of Hannes Sjoblad debunking the claim, the same media outlet publishes an article debunking that. While we should be grateful for small mercies and it is good to see the second article published setting the record straight, the concern is not so much over this disagreement between two tech startup founders, but that this does appear to be going ahead regardless. The “whether we like it or not” was probably the only truly honest statement Sjoblad made, the rest was disingenuous and deceptive narrative management to try and avoid the pushback against his tech sales.

We are truly in the age of things being dismissed as “conspiracy theory” becoming mainstream news, now within just days.